Applied Biopharmaceutics and Quality by Design for Dissolution/Release Specification Setting: Product Quality for Patient Benefit
June 10-12, 2009
Hilton Washington DC/Rockville
1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD
![]() |
Co-sponsored with: |
![]() |
In cooperation with: |
Registration
Your registration options are as follows:
Register Online. Instructions: Please choose the appropriate rate, registrations will be verified for accuracy and if incorrect you will be required to pay the full, late Pharma/CRO registration fee of ($1,250). |
|
Download the registration form, complete & mail to: August Pharmaceutical Analysis Conference |
|
![]() |
By phone at 608.262.3130 or toll-free at 877-947-4255 using a credit card for payment. |
Download the registration form, complete & fax to 608.262.2431 using a credit card for payment. |
General Conference Information
Background: With rapid advances in implementation of the Quality by Design (QbD) paradigm, new approaches and considerations for in vitro methods of drug release and their specifications are emerging. In vitro methods have great potential to be predictive of in vivo drug performance especially when used in conjunction with other biopharmaceutical tools, such as pharmacokinetic simulation and statistical modeling. Current predictive methodology while has proven to be valuable has not consistently shown to be clinically relevant. New technologies coupled with our evolving understanding of product development and clinical assessments hold promise of advancing the development of in vitro and in vivo relationships (IVIVRs-including IVIVCs) needed to set specifications that are clinically meaningful.
Goals: This conference is intended to build on ongoing efforts to harness the potential of applied biopharmaceutics and QbD for drug development and manufacturing, as well as regulatory decision-making for patient/consumer benefit. Quality attributes such as product drug release/dissolution characteristics will be considered in a clinical context encompassing risk assessment related to product efficacy, safety and quality. Clinically relevant drug release/dissolution testing, and/or other relevant methodologies that can serve as reliable and robust biopharmaceutics tools, should streamline the development, manufacture and lifecycle management of high quality drug product. The conference will have practical and forward focus such that current information and novel methodology/approaches will be discussed and encouraged. Current tools will be evaluated to determine how they can be used as is or modified to obtain meaningful IVIVRs that support the specification setting process within the QbD paradigm. In addition to current approaches, novel in vitro, in vivo, in silico and statistical models will be explored and their potential to assist the development of meaningful IVIVRs will be discussed. The conference aims to facilitate continuation of dialogue on advancing novel approaches in setting clinically meaningful in vitro drug dissolution/release specification consistent with QbD expectations.
Conference objectives include:
- To assess where we are with dissolution/drug release methods utilized during various stages of drug development (including candidate selection and ultimately, specification setting) and illustrate the value of applied biopharmaceutics and QbD principles for streamlining drug development from early development to commercial scale manufacturing and lifecycle management.
- To identify approaches for transitioning to new tools consistent with the QbD paradigm, integrating biopharmaceutics to meet current and future needs
- To develop ideas/vision leading to "common ground" (a road map) for predictive, clinically meaningful in vitro methods for dissolution/release specification setting.
Format: The program will consist of plenary sessions and breakout sessions. The breakout sessions will identify fundamental goals and critical steps needed for a road map that brings together biopharmaceutics tools and clinically relevant specification setting under the QbD paradigm. Attendees, who wish to have extended discussion on areas of interest, are encouraged to provide questions for the breakout sessions. The proposed questions for the breakout sessions may be included with the registration form or sent in separately up to one month prior to the workshop. Attendees are also encouraged to actively participate in discussions and breakout sessions and share their ideas on how they envision biopharmaceutic tools (in vitro/in vivo drug release, modeling, risk assessment and statistics) can be used for setting clinically meaningful in vitro drug dissolution/release specification. The recommendations from the meeting, including identified research areas, will be summarized in a white paper. The white paper is expected to generate further input from our rapidly evolving scientific, technical and regulatory global community and it will also serve as a guide for the subsequent efforts.
Who should attend: Scientists from industry, academia and regulatory agencies (including Europe and Japan) involved with pharmaceutical development, such as in the areas of CMC, biopharmaceutics, biostatistics, quality risk management and regulatory.
Conference Travel Information
Location & Travel
The Hilton is convenient located in Rockville, Maryland. The hotel is immediately across the street from the Washington Metro Red Line subway station (Twin Brook). The Metro comes directly form Washington Reagan Airport (Yellow Line to Galleria to Red Line). From Washington Dulles Airport there is a convenient bus service to the Metro (Orange Line to Metro Center to Red Line).
Conference Fees
Instructions: Please choose the appropriate rate, registrations will be verification for accuracy and if incorrect you will be required to pay the full, late Pharma/CRO registration fee of ($1,250).
Industrial and CRO representatives |
$1,250 ($1,050 prior to June 2) |
FDA and non-profit representatives |
$950 ($750 prior to June 2) |
Conference Planning Committee
Maria T. Cruanes, Ph.D., Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ
James E. De Muth, Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Jennifer B. Dressman, Ph.D., J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
Anette Müllertz, Ph.D., University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Moheb Nasr, Ph.D., Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
Arzu Selen, PhD., Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
For More Information
James E De Muth
Extension Services in Pharmacy
777 Highland Avenue
Madison, WI 53705
(608) 262-3130
FAX (608) 262-2431
Send Email
2009 Program Outline
Wednesday, June 10, 2009 |
|||||||||
8:00AM |
Welcome and Introduction to the Conference/workshop Program
|
||||||||
8:10 |
Impact of QbD and Future Expectations: Role of Biopharmaceutics and Quality by Design for in vitro Dissolution/release Specification Setting
|
||||||||
8:30 |
Introduction to the Conference/workshop Objectives, Program Contents and Strategy: Clinically Meaningful in vitro Drug Release/dissolution Specification Setting as Guided by Optimized Use of Biopharmaceutics and the QbD Tools
|
||||||||
9:00 |
Plenary Session 1:
Defining the First Principles in Selecting and Developing the ‘Candidate’
| ||||||||
9:00 |
Vision for Now and the Future: Preclinical Development Utilizing Biopharmaceutics and QbD Principles can Guide, Support and Optimize in vivo Drug Performance
|
||||||||
9:45 |
Break |
||||||||
10:00 |
Planning Ahead for the “Candidate”: Timely in vitro Identification of Mechanism of Drug Release and Excipients are Critical for in vivo Performance: Which Candidate with Which Excipient and Why?
|
||||||||
10:45 |
Value of Risk-taking and Lessons Learned from Utilization of in vitro and Animal Models for Risk Assessment During Insoluble Compound Formulation Development.
|
||||||||
11:30 |
Panel Discussion with Questions from the Audience |
||||||||
12:00pm |
Lunch |
||||||||
1:00 |
Plenary Session 2:
Utilizing Biopharmaceutics Tools to Design and Guide Drug Delivery for Efficacy and Safety; How can Biopharmaceutics and QbD Support the Clinical Outcome and Aid in Setting Clinically Meaningful in vitro Dissolution/release Specification?
|
||||||||
1:00 |
How Can in vitro Data Aid Specification Setting and Guide Design Space Development in an Approach Consistent with QbD: The Role of Drug Substance Physicohemical Properties; BCS Class and Clinical Data
|
||||||||
|
1:30 |
Is Understanding/integrating Design Space and Biopharmaceutics Adequate to Assure Product Quality from the Standpoint of Bioperformance?
|
||||||||
2:00 |
Considering Pre- and Post-approval Manufacturing Changes for a Drug: What would be an Efficient QbD Path for Exploring the Potential Impact of Formulation (and/or dosage form) Changes on in vivo Performance?
|
||||||||
|
2:30 |
Break |
||||||||
3:00 |
Bridging Product Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) to in vivo Performance and Clinical Outcomes
|
||||||||
|
3:30 |
Panel Discussion with Questions from the Audience |
||||||||
4:00 |
Summary of the First Day of the Conference
|
||||||||
|
4:30 |
Adjournment |
||||||||
|
Thursday, June 11, 2009 |
|||||||||
|
8:00am |
Plenary Session 3: Defining “Predictive” and Identifying Useful Tools: How Predictive “Predictive” Needs To Be for Ensuring Product Quality, Safety and Efficacy? Innovative, Advanced or Borrowed Tools: Pros and Con
|
||||||||
8:00 |
What are in vitro Predictive Tools? Is there an Acceptable Scale of “Predictivity” that can be Used for Clinically Relevant Specification Setting? Should all Biopharmaceutics Tools be Predictive to the Same Extent?
|
||||||||
8:45 |
Can in vitro Methods/tools Adequately Predict in vivo Food Effect and/or Drug Absorption Under Extreme Conditions or in Special Populations? In the New QbD Paradigm, What Type of Studies Should be Conducted to Ascertain Whether in vivo Food Effect or Extreme Condition Studies are Necessary?
|
||||||||
9:30 |
Break |
||||||||
|
10:00 |
Plenary Session 3 Continues: Innovative, Advanced or Borrowed Tools: Pros and Cons |
||||||||
10:00 |
Pros and Cons: Tools to Move Forward: An Industry Perspective
|
||||||||
|
10:30 |
Pros and Cons: Tools to move forward; A Biostatistics Perspective
|
||||||||
11:00 |
Pros and Cons: Tools to Move Forward: A Regulatory Perspective
|
||||||||
|
11:30 |
Panel Discussion with Questions from the Audience |
||||||||
12:00pm |
Lunch |
||||||||
|
1:00 |
Introduction to Breakout Sessions: Process and Expectations
|
||||||||
1:10 |
Breakout Sessions on Approaches/Tools for Setting in vitro Dissolution/Release Specification and Recommendations for the Next Steps
|
||||||||
|
2:30 |
Break |
||||||||
3:00 |
Breakout sessions (repeated) – participants will rotate through two of the four breakout groups, based on personal preferences. |
||||||||
|
4:30 |
Adjournment |
||||||||
|
Friday, June 12, 2009 |
|||||||||
|
8:00am |
Breakout Session Reports (15 min each) (i.e. covering specific areas on the current status, what can be done, and what needs to be done to meet the first milestone)
|
||||||||
|
9:00 |
General Discussion with Questions from the Audience |
||||||||
|
9:30 |
Break |
||||||||
|
9:45 |
Plenary Session 4: Merging Old and New: Implementation challenges
|
||||||||
|
9:45 |
A Regulatory Perspective (Regulatory speaker representing EU)
|
||||||||
|
10:15 |
A Regulatory Perspective (Regulatory speaker from Japan)
|
||||||||
|
10:45 |
A Pharmaceutical Industry Perspective
|
||||||||
|
11:15 |
A Regulatory Perspective
|
||||||||
11:45 |
Panel Discussion with Questions from the Audience | ||||||||
12:15 |
Wrap up and Closure (with plans for the next steps)
|
||||||||
12:30 |
Adjournment |



