ESP banner

Applied Biopharmaceutics and Quality by Design for Dissolution/Release Specification Setting: Product Quality for Patient Benefit

June 10-12, 2009
Hilton Washington DC/Rockville
1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD

Co-sponsored with:
Office of New Drug Quality Assessment
Office of Pharmaceutical Science
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
Food and Drug Administration

In cooperation with:
American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

Registration

Your registration options are as follows:

monitor

Register Online. Instructions: Please choose the appropriate rate, registrations will be verified for accuracy and if incorrect you will be required to pay the full, late Pharma/CRO registration fee of ($1,250).

Industrial and CRO representatives - $1,250 ($1,050 prior to June 2)

FDA and non-profit representatives - $950 ($750 prior to June 2)

envelope

Download the registration form, complete & mail to:

August Pharmaceutical Analysis Conference
Extension Services in Pharmacy
777 Highland Avenue
Madison, WI 53705

phone

By phone at 608.262.3130 or toll-free at 877-947-4255 using a credit card for payment.

fax

Download the registration form, complete & fax to 608.262.2431 using a credit card for payment.

General Conference Information

Background: With rapid advances in implementation of the Quality by Design (QbD) paradigm, new approaches and considerations for in vitro methods of drug release and their specifications are emerging. In vitro methods have great potential to be predictive of in vivo drug performance especially when used in conjunction with other biopharmaceutical tools, such as pharmacokinetic simulation and statistical modeling. Current predictive methodology while has proven to be valuable has not consistently shown to be clinically relevant. New technologies coupled with our evolving understanding of product development and clinical assessments hold promise of advancing the development of in vitro and in vivo relationships (IVIVRs-including IVIVCs) needed to set specifications that are clinically meaningful.

Goals: This conference is intended to build on ongoing efforts to harness the potential of applied biopharmaceutics and QbD for drug development and manufacturing, as well as regulatory decision-making for patient/consumer benefit. Quality attributes such as product drug release/dissolution characteristics will be considered in a clinical context encompassing risk assessment related to product efficacy, safety and quality. Clinically relevant drug release/dissolution testing, and/or other relevant methodologies that can serve as reliable and robust biopharmaceutics tools, should streamline the development, manufacture and lifecycle management of high quality drug product. The conference will have practical and forward focus such that current information and novel methodology/approaches will be discussed and encouraged. Current tools will be evaluated to determine how they can be used as is or modified to obtain meaningful IVIVRs that support the specification setting process within the QbD paradigm. In addition to current approaches, novel in vitro, in vivo, in silico and statistical models will be explored and their potential to assist the development of meaningful IVIVRs will be discussed. The conference aims to facilitate continuation of dialogue on advancing novel approaches in setting clinically meaningful in vitro drug dissolution/release specification consistent with QbD expectations.

Conference objectives include:

  1. To assess where we are with dissolution/drug release methods utilized during various stages of drug development (including candidate selection and ultimately, specification setting) and illustrate the value of applied biopharmaceutics and QbD principles for streamlining drug development from early development to commercial scale manufacturing and lifecycle management.
  2. To identify approaches for transitioning to new tools consistent with the QbD paradigm, integrating biopharmaceutics to meet current and future needs
  3. To develop ideas/vision leading to "common ground" (a road map) for predictive, clinically meaningful in vitro methods for dissolution/release specification setting.

Format: The program will consist of plenary sessions and breakout sessions. The breakout sessions will identify fundamental goals and critical steps needed for a road map that brings together biopharmaceutics tools and clinically relevant specification setting under the QbD paradigm. Attendees, who wish to have extended discussion on areas of interest, are encouraged to provide questions for the breakout sessions. The proposed questions for the breakout sessions may be included with the registration form or sent in separately up to one month prior to the workshop. Attendees are also encouraged to actively participate in discussions and breakout sessions and share their ideas on how they envision biopharmaceutic tools (in vitro/in vivo drug release, modeling, risk assessment and statistics) can be used for setting clinically meaningful in vitro drug dissolution/release specification. The recommendations from the meeting, including identified research areas, will be summarized in a white paper. The white paper is expected to generate further input from our rapidly evolving scientific, technical and regulatory global community and it will also serve as a guide for the subsequent efforts.

Who should attend: Scientists from industry, academia and regulatory agencies (including Europe and Japan) involved with pharmaceutical development, such as in the areas of CMC, biopharmaceutics, biostatistics, quality risk management and regulatory.

Conference Travel Information

Location & Travel

The Hilton is convenient located in Rockville, Maryland. The hotel is immediately across the street from the Washington Metro Red Line subway station (Twin Brook). The Metro comes directly form Washington Reagan Airport (Yellow Line to Galleria to Red Line). From Washington Dulles Airport there is a convenient bus service to the Metro (Orange Line to Metro Center to Red Line).

Conference Fees

Instructions: Please choose the appropriate rate, registrations will be verification for accuracy and if incorrect you will be required to pay the full, late Pharma/CRO registration fee of ($1,250).

Industrial and CRO representatives

$1,250 ($1,050 prior to June 2)

FDA and non-profit representatives

$950 ($750 prior to June 2)

 

Conference Planning Committee

Maria T. Cruanes, Ph.D., Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ
James E. De Muth, Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Jennifer B. Dressman, Ph.D., J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
Anette Müllertz, Ph.D., University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Moheb Nasr, Ph.D., Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
Arzu Selen, PhD., Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD

For More Information

James E De Muth
Extension Services in Pharmacy
777 Highland Avenue
Madison, WI 53705
(608) 262-3130
FAX (608) 262-2431
Send Email

2009 Program Outline

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

 

8:00AM

Welcome and Introduction to the Conference/workshop Program

Christine M. V. Moore, Ph.D.
Acting Office Deputy Director, Office of New Drug Quality Assessment
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD

James E. De Muth, Ph.D.
Professor, School of Pharmacy
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

8:10

Impact of QbD and Future Expectations: Role of Biopharmaceutics and Quality by Design for in vitro Dissolution/release Specification Setting

Helen Winkle
Office Director, Office of Pharmaceutical Science
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD

8:30

Introduction to the Conference/workshop Objectives, Program Contents and Strategy: Clinically Meaningful in vitro Drug Release/dissolution Specification Setting as Guided by Optimized Use of Biopharmaceutics and the QbD Tools

Arzu Selen, Ph.D.
Associate Director of Biopharmaceutics
Office of New Drug Quality Assessment
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD

9:00

Plenary Session 1: Defining the First Principles in Selecting and Developing the ‘Candidate’

Moderator: Christine M. V. Moore, Ph.D.

9:00

Vision for Now and the Future: Preclinical Development Utilizing Biopharmaceutics and QbD Principles can Guide, Support and Optimize in vivo Drug Performance

Anette Müllertz, Ph.D.
Head of Center, Bioneer: FARMA
Department of Pharmaceutics and Analytical Chemistry
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Copenhagen
Copenhagen, Denmark

9:45

Break

10:00

Planning Ahead for the “Candidate”: Timely in vitro Identification of Mechanism of Drug Release and Excipients are Critical for in vivo Performance: Which Candidate with Which Excipient and Why?

Maria T. Cruanes, Ph.D.
Research Fellow/Group Leader
Pharmaceutical Research & Development
Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA

10:45

Value of Risk-taking and Lessons Learned from Utilization of in vitro and Animal Models for Risk Assessment During Insoluble Compound Formulation Development.

Tahseen Mirza, Ph.D.
Director, Technical Research and Development
Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, East Hanover, NJ

11:30

Panel Discussion with Questions from the Audience

12:00pm

Lunch

1:00

Plenary Session 2: Utilizing Biopharmaceutics Tools to Design and Guide Drug Delivery for Efficacy and Safety; How can Biopharmaceutics and QbD Support the Clinical Outcome and Aid in Setting Clinically Meaningful in vitro Dissolution/release Specification?

Moderator: Maria T. Cruanes, Ph.D.

1:00

How Can in vitro Data Aid Specification Setting and Guide Design Space Development in an Approach Consistent with QbD: The Role of Drug Substance Physicohemical Properties; BCS Class and Clinical Data

Paul Dickinson, Ph.D.
Principal Scientist, Pharmaceutical and Analytical Research & Development
AstraZeneca, Cheshire, England

1:30

Is Understanding/integrating Design Space and Biopharmaceutics Adequate to Assure Product Quality from the Standpoint of Bioperformance?

Gordon T. Muirhead
Vice President, Head of New Product Introduction
Global Manufacture and Supply
GlaxoSmithKline, Ware, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom

2:00

Considering Pre- and Post-approval Manufacturing Changes for a Drug: What would be an Efficient QbD Path for Exploring the Potential Impact of Formulation (and/or dosage form) Changes on in vivo Performance?

Jack Cook, Ph.D.
Clinical Pharmacology Lead, Specialty Care Business Unit
Pfizer Inc., New London, CT

2:30

Break

3:00

Bridging Product Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) to in vivo Performance and Clinical Outcomes

Arzu Selen, Ph.D.

3:30

Panel Discussion with Questions from the Audience

4:00

Summary of the First Day of the Conference

Maria T. Cruanes, Ph.D.

4:30

Adjournment

Thursday, June 11, 2009

8:00am

Plenary Session 3: Defining “Predictive” and Identifying Useful Tools: How Predictive “Predictive” Needs To Be for Ensuring Product Quality, Safety and Efficacy? Innovative, Advanced or Borrowed Tools: Pros and Con

Moderator: Anette Müllertz, Ph.D.

8:00

What are in vitro Predictive Tools? Is there an Acceptable Scale of “Predictivity” that can be Used for Clinically Relevant Specification Setting? Should all Biopharmaceutics Tools be Predictive to the Same Extent?

Jennifer B. Dressman, Ph.D.
Professor of Pharmaceutical Technology
J.W. Goethe University
Frankfurt, Germany

8:45

Can in vitro Methods/tools Adequately Predict in vivo Food Effect and/or Drug Absorption Under Extreme Conditions or in Special Populations? In the New QbD Paradigm, What Type of Studies Should be Conducted to Ascertain Whether in vivo Food Effect or Extreme Condition Studies are Necessary?

Christos Reppas, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Faculty of Pharmacy
National & Kapodistrian University of Athens
Zografou, Greece

9:30

Break

10:00

Plenary Session 3 Continues: Innovative, Advanced or Borrowed Tools: Pros and Cons

10:00

Pros and Cons: Tools to Move Forward: An Industry Perspective

Filippos Kesisoglou, Ph.D.
Research Fellow/Group Leader
Pharmaceutical Research & Development
Merck & Co, Inc., West Point, PA

10:30

Pros and Cons: Tools to move forward; A Biostatistics Perspective

Stefaan Rossenu, Ph.D.
Senior Scientist, Advanced Modeling and Simulation Group
Clinical Pharmacology Department
Johnson and Johnson, Pharmaceutical R&D, Beerse, Belgium

11:00

Pros and Cons: Tools to Move Forward: A Regulatory Perspective

Patrick Marroum, Ph.D.
Special Assistant, Office of New Drug Quality Assessment
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD

11:30

Panel Discussion with Questions from the Audience

12:00pm

Lunch

1:00

Introduction to Breakout Sessions: Process and Expectations

Arzu Selen, Ph.D.

1:10

Breakout Sessions on Approaches/Tools for Setting in vitro Dissolution/Release Specification and Recommendations for the Next Steps

1) Integrating Biopharmaceutical Assessment into the QbD Paradigm

Moderators:

Paul Dickinson, Ph.D.
Jennifer B. Dressman, Ph.D.
Tahseen Mirza, Ph.D.
Arzu Selen, PhD.

2) Predictive Statistical Tools

Moderators:

Jack Cook, Ph.D.
Stefaan Rossenu, Ph.D.
Timothy Schofield, MA, Senior Consultant, Biologics Consulting Group, Inc., Alexandria, VA
Yi Tsong, Ph.D., Deputy Division Director, Division of Biometrics VI, Office of Biometrics, CDER, FDA, Silver Springs, MD

3) Predictive Mechanistic Tools

Moderators:

John Crison, Ph.D., Director, Life Sciences, Simulations Plus, Inc., Lancaster, CA
Kevin C. Johnson, Ph.D., President, Intellipharm, LLC, Niantic, CT
Filippos Kesisoglou, Ph.D.
Christine M.V. Moore, Ph.D.
James E. Polli, Ph.D., Professor, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD

                                               

4) Predictive Analytical Tools

Moderators:

Maria T. Cruanes, Ph.D.
Mansoor Khan, R.Ph., Ph.D., Director, Division of Product Quality Research OTR/OPS/CDER/ FDA, Silver Spring, MD
Gordon Muirhead
Anette Müllertz, Ph.D.

2:30

Break

3:00

Breakout sessions (repeated) – participants will rotate through two of the four breakout groups, based on personal preferences.

4:30

Adjournment

Friday, June 12, 2009

8:00am

Breakout Session Reports (15 min each) (i.e. covering specific areas on the current status, what can be done, and what needs to be done to meet the first milestone)

Moderator: Arzu Selen, Ph.D.

9:00

General Discussion with Questions from the Audience

9:30

Break

9:45

Plenary Session 4: Merging Old and New: Implementation challenges

Moderator: Arzu Selen, Ph.D.

9:45

A Regulatory Perspective (Regulatory speaker representing EU)           

Jobst Limberg, Ph.D.
Scientific Director
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Bonn, Germany

10:15

A Regulatory Perspective (Regulatory speaker from Japan)

Chikako Yomota, Ph.D.
Manager of First Section
Drug Division National Institute of Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan

10:45

A Pharmaceutical Industry Perspective

Alan Royce, Ph.D.
Executive Director, Technical Research and Development
Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, East Hanover, NJ

11:15

A Regulatory Perspective

Christine M.V. Moore, Ph.D.

11:45

Panel Discussion with Questions from the Audience

12:15

Wrap up and Closure (with plans for the next steps)

Arzu Selen, Ph.D.

12:30

Adjournment

green block